Ucadia Blog Feed Reader
Displaying most recent entries of the Ucadia Blog (read more here)
Published: [ Wed 16th Jul, 2014 ]_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (81 min 28 Mb)
Hello, this is Frank O’Collins for Wednesday 16th July 2014 and many thanks to all of you who are taking the time to read and listen to the Ucadia blog for this week being the second of a three part series on the true history of the law and the “behind the scenes” formation of the United States of America. This second part today is entitled the “True History of America Part 2 (1840-1939): The False God of Perpetual War”.
Before we start the blog and audio for this week, I’d like to repeat what I first did last week and briefly cover a few points for all who come to read and listen to the first blog and audio from last week and now this blog and audio:
1. The first point I want to cover is to urge each and everyone to first read and listen to the blog from last week entitled the “True History of America Part 1 (1666-1840): The Curse against the Patriots”. If it takes a bit of time to get through it all and review the links to prima facie and irrefutable evidence then don’t worry. Because, if you don’t take the time to read and listen to the first blog and audio of this three part series, then what I will be covering tonight will not be as clear as it needs to be. There is so much to cover in such a short time that I simply am not able to repeat each and every point I made last week. So please, I urge each and everyone who comes to this blog and audio to read the first part of the series.
2. The second point I wish to mention is a reinforcement of a fundamental element I mentioned last week being my complete respect of the American people and my total admiration of the integrity of the American dream. This is because there is absolutely nothing to justify the questioning of the integrity or historic ideals memorialized within the Declaration of Independence. Nor is there anything I have discovered in my decades of reading and research to suggest that those men who gave up their lives fighting against the Red Army of the United Company of Merchants were anything other than true heroes and American patriots. Certainly those ten thousand martyrs betrayed by the sociopathic mercenary leader of the Blue Army of the United Company of Merchants and then murdered by the Red Army of the United Company of Merchants deserve to have their day of remembrance restored, instead of their memory being cursed and disgraced every year by a celebration of eating turkey.
As for the American Dream, I think it is one of the greatest utopian gifts of humanity and despite the trickery, the deception by the bankers and their allies to all of us, there is no good reason to justify sacrificing the idea that Life is a Dream that we can strive to make better.
3. The third point I wish to mention before we start is the fact that no one has anything to fear – even those who have spent their lives defending the status quo. The first people the Private Bar Guild deceives are their own members. Every elite secret society and occult fraternity believes they and they alone hold the secrets to the true history of the world – when absolutely none of them do, because all of them have been tricked in some way by the very design of a system to keep people separated, distracted and in many respects ignorant of the past. The truth is educating ourselves of the evidence and seeing it for what it is – without embellishment, or wild conjecture.
There is no need for conspiracy theories or presumptions. If there is no evidence, then there is no evidence. Yet, as you hopefully discovered in the blog and audio last week, when one looks forensically and diligently at all the facts, there is no shortage of evidence as to the true history of the United States of America and the forces that have influenced its growth – most notably the American people themselves.
For whatever we find, there is one consistent and irrepressible inspiration from all of this – that the American people have risen time and time again to overcome, to adapt and to uphold the dream of a better world, a fairer world. So with these points in mind, lets start with some background first that we did not have time to cover in more detail last week, namely the United States of the Netherlands and the connection to the founding of the United States of America.
The United States of the Netherlands and the United States of America
Last week, I mentioned how bright and brave men were tricked and distracted by a deliberate program to re-write the models of history through the promotion of romantic and high sounding ideals, that did not necessarily reflect the truth of history, nor the reality of the world. The “Law of Nations” by Emerich de Vattel was one such example we discussed.
To demonstrate the point, I also provided links to some of the treaties formed with Great Britain as part of the Grand Luciferian Alliance from 1666. One of those participants in the alliance was the 13 states of the Dutch Republic which existed from 1581 until internal revolutions ousted the merchant elite in 1794 and a true democratic republic was temporary installed in 1795, which then lasted until around 1806.
As I am sure many of you know, the Dutch and in particular the Dutch East India Company or “VOC” also had a long history associated with the colonization of America, in particular the Island of Manhattan on which they founded a large fortified settlement in 1612 on the southern end of the Island which they called New Amsterdam. The northern fortified wall of this private commercial venture crossing on Manhattan Island is approximately the same path as Wall Street today – thus Wall Street literally remains a symbol of the original private ownership of Manhattan Island by these Dutch merchant families.
In any event, the English and the Dutch did not always exactly get along and the basis of some of the treaties mentioned in 1666 were in part an answer to the most bloody conflicts between the Dutch and the English over the previous two years, in which the English seized control of New Amsterdam and renamed it New York in 1665 in honor of future King James II of England, then Duke of York.
Now the reason I am going back to this history of New Amsterdam, aka New York, is that there are a number of loose ends concerning the history of these elite Dutch families that made their money through the hugely wealthy Dutch East India Company and its key role in the global drugs trade of opium and hashish and cocaine as well as total dominance of the slave trade – especially African slaves. These loose ends as you will see in a moment are a crucial part of the puzzle in understanding the events in America from 1840 to the 20th Century.
First, the level of conflict between the Dutch and the English appears to have been deliberately overstated, when in effect there were several skirmishes and only two occasions of limited aggression, the first being 1664 to 1665 causing around 10,000 casualties between both sides and between 1672 to 1673 causing less than 3,000 casualties. Compared to the wars with France and other powers, these casualties are some of the smallest wars in European history. For example, there were more than 8,000,000 casualties during the Thirty Years War (1618-1648) in the same century. The point I am making is that despite the best efforts to paint a difficult relationship, the Dutch and the English were close – as evidenced by the Articles of Peace and Alliance in 1666, the Articles of Navigation and Commerce in 1666, the Maritime Treaty of 1674 that for the first time created the concept of Passports and extended International Admiralty Law across lands and sea; the Treaty of Peace of 1686 that held both countries had to return the private property of one another prior to the earlier conflicts, such as New Amsterdam, aka New York, and the new Treaty of Navigation and Commerce in 1686.
Second, last week I mentioned the United Company of Merchants, also known as the East India Company, was the largest and most powerful multi-national corporation of the world in the 18th Century. That statement is true in respect to the very end of that Century, but not necessarily for the period prior to the foundation of the United States of America. Instead, there existed a huge rival multi-national corporation that had no such problem with profit – in fact it was arguably the most profitable company in history worth approximately 78 million Dutch Gold Guilders in 1637 or approximately $8 trillion in 2014 US Dollars. Whereas, this company shipped millions of tons of goods, people and slaves from its foundation in 1602 to its sudden and mysterious disappearance by 1796, the United Company of Merchants only managed less than a third of that volume. Whereas this company commanded no less than 5,000 ships before this massive shipping and naval fleet appeared to vanish from the view of history overnight, the British could only ever count for less than a quarter of this number of ships. The name of the company was of course the Dutch East India Company and the key to its phenomenally successful Business Model rested on controlling the world markets of four key commodities –narcotics, slavery, military weapons and mineral exploration, supported by its business partner the Bank of Amsterdam.
Incidentally, you may recall last week I expressed the fact that the slave trade from Africa to America did not commence until after the War for Independence ended. What I didn’t do was give you legislative proof of the fact that the slave trade did not start till 1783. While the Royal African Company was recognized in an act of parliament in 1752 (25Geo2.c.40), the very first act explicitly regulating the African slave trade passed by Westminster was in 1788 (28Geo3.c.54) then 1789 (29Geo3.c.66), 1790 (30Geo3.c.33), 1791 (31Geo3.c.54) and (31Geo3.c.55), 1792 (32Geo3.c.52), 1793 (33Geo3.c.73), 1794 (34Geo3.c.80), 1795 (35Geo3.c.90), 1796 (36Geo3.c.118) and (36Geo3. c.119), 1798 (38Geo3.c.80) and 1799 (39Geo3.c80).
As for claimed evidence as various statutes such as the alleged Virginia Slave Code of 1705 and Slave Trade ledgers in places such as South Carolina, I put it to you that great effort has been made to allege the founding American people complicit and willing participants in a barbaric trade, by both obscuring the origins of the Dutch and English slave traders and when the African slaves began being shipped to North America en masse. In the end, it is up to you to decide what is true or false.
The third point of mystery about the Dutch is that virtually everything about the first Dutch Republic is obscured with confusion and contradictory claims. For example, prior to Prince William 5th of Orange (1748-1806) seeking political asylum in London by 1794 along with the head of the Bank of Amsterdam named Meyer Rothschild, we know that the Republic was made up of thirteen states. We know they were called States, because Prince William was called the States-General and the word State is referenced with these various places through hundreds of thousands of texts. From North to South, the original 13 states of the Republic appear to have been: Frisia with its capital Emden, Ommelanden with its Capital Groningen, Friesland with its capital Leeuwarden, Drenthe with its capital Assen, Overijssel with its capital Zwolle, Amsterdam with its capital Haarlem, Holland with its capital The Hague, Utrecht with its capital Utrecht, Gelderland with its capital Arnhem, Rotterdam with its capital Rotterdam, Zeeland with its capital Middleburg, Brabant with its capital Breda and Vlaanderen with its capital Bruges. Yet what is even stranger is the obscurity with its name. Various texts called the Republic the United Netherlands and some even the United Provinces, when none of the states were called provinces but States. So what could possibly be the motive for hiding the original name of the United States of Netherlands?
Well, we can clear up one mystery regarding what happened to the 5,000 or so merchant vessels and military ships of the Dutch East India Company from 1795 when an act was passed (35Geo3.c.56) which in the last half of it granted Dutch merchants involved in sea trade the right to reside in British dominions, pay no duty, purchase estates and carry on their business as Denizens. In the same year yet another act was passed (35Geo3.c.62) where the Postmaster General of Great Britain assumed the duties and obligations of Post of the exiled Dutch Republic as well as the continuation of Dutch financial transactions of entities and companies and banks that were supposed to have vanished into thin air. Why is this important? Because this act effectively makes the Post Office the bridge between an old world of the United States of the Netherlands and the Bank of Amsterdam and whatever these entities and their merchant owners became. Without such a statute, 90% or more of the business of these merchant families would have ceased as everything about contracts, bills, demands, writs and notes needed the Post.
Now, yet another act favoring the Dutch was passed in the year 1795 (35Geo3.c.80), which deserves special mention, because this act is unlike anything ever passed by Westminster before or since. Without granting a charter or creating a company, this particular act effectively permits the Dutch merchants to land goods and by default slaves on British soil and continue their business, free of duties as well as import their own personal goods and valuables including gold and valuables to dominions of Great Britain without risk of seizure or taxes or duties, providing they intended to remain as residents- not citizens but Denizens or strangers of no particular religion.
By no particular religion, I am referring to families who saw themselves and still see themselves as neither Christian or Muslim or Quaker or even Jewish for that matter – but whatever is convenient. Since instilling themselves within the fabric of the British Empire, it has sometimes suited them to be known as Protestant or Jewish and more recently even as Muslim. But trying to label them as one or the other religion does no service to clarity and in fact many times allows the spin doctors hired by these immensely wealthy families to claim they are victims of an unjust witch hunt based purely on bigotry.
In any event, in 1796, in the same year that Great Britain recognized the integrity of the United States (36Geo3.c.97) the British confirmed through an act of parliament (36Geo3.c.63) the exiled Dutch merchants the unprecedented right to register their vessels as British ships and continue in their merchant businesses without the United Company of Merchants being able to interfere with them.
Now, I have studied the Acts of Westminster and the Congress of the United States and Canada and Australia and several other nations, and these mentioned acts are unprecedented as they literally permit another nation – a nation formed of merchants and bankers to continue as themselves like some organized network of parasites within the host. Quite simply, I have never seen anything like it at any other time in history. It mean the elite Dutch families would have been able to ship the thousands of tons of gold to any dominion of Great Britain and move en masse to key ports and maintain their trade of slavery, narcotics and spices, minerals and gems as well as arms sales. But where did they go?
Well, the heads of the former Bank of Amsterdam moved to Britain and London to become the parasites within the Bank of England, itself a parasite living off the host of the British Empire. The 13 original Dutch merchant families of the former 13 States of the United States of the Netherlands moved primarily to Boston New York and proceeded to transform the Bank of New York from a small colonial bank to an International Global Financial Powerhouse later to transform in part to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York by 1913 that today handles more than US $1.1 trillion in fund transactions per day and holds just under US$1 trillion in Gold Reserves. The Dutch families also facilitated the establishment of the State Street Corporation in Boston and today managing over US $30 trillion in assets. The former shareholders of the Dutch East India Company also established the Bank of the Manhattan Company known today as JPMorgan Chase with assets of over US $3 trillion. By 1799, the Dutch successfully purchased Manhattan Island which became the private property of the Manhattan Company.
Thus, by 1799 the families of the Dutch East India Company and their Business Model of narcotics and pharmaceuticals, of mining and chemicals, of slavery and banking and arms dealing and perpetual war became the parasite known as Wall Street living within the host known as the United States of America.
Now, some of you by now who are reading this blog and hearing this audio may once again find your heads spinning and I apologize for that. There is a huge amount to absorb. Some may still be unconvinced by the overwhelming forensic and prima facie evidence we have presented so far, much less the additional evidence I will be sharing.
Whatever your feeling and however you are taking the information we have been discussing so far, I hope you will persist in finishing listening to this blog and reading this article because now we are ready to discuss the events leading up to the Civil War as well as after the Civil War in a better context.
The Banking Wars 1812-1913
Let us summarize what we now know as to the various competing groups embedded into the fabric of the United States of America leading toward 1812 and what I have now described as a period of perpetual banking wars:
(1) The Crown of Great Britain – This is the first party that we see through statute and will see again in statute shortly, that never surrendered its claims to absolutely own the land known as North America; and
(2) The Bank of England – We see the Bank of England seeking to protect its interests through the US Treasurer of the Navy (Admiralty) and in particular its desire to install and control a central bank, beginning with the First Bank of the United States from 1791 to 1811 and then a second hard fought battle for a new Central Bank from 1816 to 1836; and
(3) The United Company of Merchants – Holding the leases over the traditional plantations of North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Georgia and Rhode Island, which it was forced to cede to the Dutch merchants; and
(4) Wall Street – Being the private nation, banks and corporations of the Manhattan Company and the continuation of the Dutch East India Company and completely opposed to the encroachment and power of the Bank of England and the United Company of Merchants; and
(5) The American People – Who continued to seek freedoms and prosperity and the fulfilment of the Dream of the Declaration of Independence midst these commercial monsters and special interests.
Let me continue then with an overlay of the continuing battle of the Crown and Westminster to enforce its authority over the United States of America as was then resisted by both the American People and of course Wall Street.
Now in the previous blog and audio, we discussed the creation of the model of Upper Canada and Lower Canada in 1791 (31Geo3.c.31). I also shared, that in the case of Lower Canada, such statutes and regulations were largely ignored. So when the First Central Bank ceased to operate in 1812 and discontinued, thanks to immense pressure by Wall Street, the British were incensed and some may recall the infamous attacks launched against the City of Washington and subsequent trade embargoes until a shaky peace was re-established by 1816. Yet by 1825 a new act was established creating the Canada Company (6Geo4.c.75) in order to give specific powers and control over a body to counteract Wall Street. Those powers were expanded in 1828 (9Geo4.c.51) and again in 1856 (19&20Vict.c.23).
Another punishment and control from the Crown of England and Westminster was the perpetual issue of land ownership leading up to the Civil War. There were a series of acts permitting the Canada Company and the officials of Upper and Lower Canada to sell crown land, also known as the “Clergy Reserves” as in 1827 (7&8Geo4_c62), 1831 (1&2Will4.c.20), 1840 (3&4Vict.c.78) and 1853 (16&17Vict.c.21).
But what is also in evidence by the various acts of Westminster is the frustration at the stubbornness of the leaders of the United States of America at the time and indeed the American People at steadfastly refusing to bow to England and the Bank of England. This is evident in various acts trying to reign in and disavow acts that the Crown of Great Britain considered repugnant or a usurping of their authority such as in 1838 (1Vict.c.9) and 1839 (2&3Vict.c.53) resulting finally in the union of Upper and Lower Canada into the Province of Canada in 1840 (3&4Vict.c.35) and reinforced again with an act in 1848 (11&12Vict.c.56). Westminster even demanded in 1849 that the United States as Lower Canada, address its jurisdictional issues at the new courts of Vancouver Island (12&13Vict.c.48) following the Oregon Treaty of 1846, similar to an act in 1791 for Upper Canada in the creation of the superior courts on Newfoundland Island (31Geo3.c.29). After the Civil war we see the creation of the Dominion Government of Canada in 1867 (30&31Vict.c.3) and amended in 1871 to define the provinces within the Dominion of Canada (34&35Vict.c.28).
One of the classic examples of the stubbornness and willingness of American Leaders to thumb their nose at the continued English claims to America was the true Thirteenth Amendment banning foreign titles or foreign influence on domestic officials which was passed by the 11th Congress in 1810 as evidenced by the 1850 official publication of the Statutes at Large for the United States of America; and then ratified by 1811 by all States except New York and Rhode Island (not surprisingly) and Connecticut as evidenced by the report by James Monroe reprinted in the 1834 publication of the official State papers.
Despite the best efforts of the crown and the Bank of England to intimidate, trick and bribe members of Congress and the Senate to betray the American people, the vast majority of these elected leaders remained surprisingly steadfast and honorable. Even the passing of one of the most extraordinary acts I have ever seen in reading over 800 years of claimed statutes of Westminster being the act of 1847 (10&11Vict.c.71) creating a “Civil List” or basically perpetual pensions and golden handcuffs to blatantly bribe public officials, did not work. The elected officials of America did not betray the people in taking their 30 pieces of silver until after the Civil War and now of course, these massive bribes and payouts are one of the key reasons Congress and the Senate has become so corrupt and cut off from reality today by continuing to serve the wishes of the mentally insane bankers at all cost.
There was however, one issue that the British and Wall Street were in agreement – the rising population of educated American Patriots was a threat to their control of the United States and the world at large. Unless they found an effective way to murder some 150,000 to 500,000 of these brave men and their families, then their Business Model of perpetual forms of slavery and banking, drugs trade, arms trade and mining and chemicals would be over. Thus, the planning for the greatest Banker controlled war the world had yet seen was put into motion, no later than 1858.
The Civil War
Now, I am not going to get into the blow-by-blow details of the Civil War between the Union of the United States, also known as the “Union” and the Confederation of the United States of America, also known as the “Confederacy”. There are two brief reasons – the first being we do not have enough time and the second is that I do not wish in anyway to besmirch the memory of those brave men – on both sides who fought and died in that terrible bloody war orchestrated by the bankers.
What I do wish to do, is reveal to you the premeditated planning to start the war, the irrefutable evidence associated with the constitutional consequences of the War and the aftermath of the war in creating a perpetual war machine, under which we are still experiencing the effects today.
First, let us clear up a deliberate and quite frankly idiotic and unsustainable assertion- the original form of treaty between the States of the United States was a Union through a Treaty of Perpetual Union and not a Confederation. That is why the catch cry of the Northern States to go to war was “To Preserve the Union”. It is also why the preamble of the Constitution refers to a union or a "more perfect union". It is also why the original Constitution refers to the granting of powers (which is a gift) and not a delegation of powers (as in a confederation). It is also why it was called the Union Army and not the Confederate Army. The Confederate Army was called the Confederate Army. So why is there such stubborn confusion amongst people? How could so many suspend common sense and reason in the face of such overwhelming facts?
Well, the reason is because in every single history book and on display in Washington, D.C. is the claimed Articles of Confederation that were supposed to have been formed in 1777 and then “replaced” by the Constitution in 1788. And the reason is simple because Article 1 of these Articles says “The Stile of this confederacy shall be The United States of America”. So no wonder there is confusion.
Why then? Why would the Union Army under the mind control of Wall Street use terms of the Confederacy it just defeated? What possible motive would the bankers and their loyal servants and mercenaries have in creating such confusion?
To answer this, we need to look at what happened in the lead up to the stealing of the election of 1860 for Presidency when Wall Street, blatantly corrupted the ballots in one of the few openly conceded corrupt elections. After the Presidential election at the end of 1860, it was clear that nothing would stop Wall Street in declaring their candidate the winner, despite the fact his three other Presidential contenders being two democrats and one conservative effectively split the vote making it statistically impossible for Lincoln to get the necessary majority of electoral college votes.
Contrary to revised history and fraudulent documents, it is only then that the States not under the control of the Dutch Wall Street Bankers ceded from the Union. The problem for the bankers was this simple issue of law- when a party to a treaty forming a body, abjures from such a union, the union ceases to exist. There are no ifs, ands, buts or technical complexities- that the original treaty is dead, gone and buried. And that is precisely what Georgia and South Carolina did when they signed the Articles of Confederation of the United States of America by the end of 1860. Just in case anyone still wants to argue the point – once the Southern States signed the Articles of Confederation for The United States of America by the end of 1860 (more than 3 months before Lincoln took his false oath to a non-existent office) – the original United States ceased to exist lawfully and legally. That is an irrefutable fact that is well overdue to have put on the record once and for all, and is not subject to debate or argument. Just to be crystal clear- Lincoln was never the legitimate President of the United States of America ever, because he was never elected under the Constitution of the Confederacy of the United States of America.
Now what is incredible about the new Constitution of the United States of America is that those American Patriots and Heroes made sure they got rid of all the corruptions in the original document which the slave trading Dutch bankers forced upon the original states. All the claimed copies of the claimed Confederate Constitution are a fraud. I have a copy of the true Constitution signed by those states who risked everything against the might of Wall Street and the Crown of Great Britain and the Bank of England.
I can also prove to you very simply that all the claimed copies of the Confederate Constitution which are on public display are a complete fraud. It is because every fake document calls the fake constitution the Confederate States of America and never ever the United States of America. Yet we know three irrefutable and absolute facts (1) The original United States of America formed by Union ceased to exist the moment the Treaty known as the Articles of Confederation were signed at the end of 1860 by Georgia and South Carolina; and (2) The Union Army won the war; and (3) The claimed legitimate document that is put up to proclaim the United States as a body is the corrupted Articles of Confederation now known as the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. So these bankers and their accomplices continue to tell us all in plain sight that we are completely stupid to think their propaganda because the only reason any United States of America continues to exist is because of the brave men and women of the South called the “Confederates”.
Now, let us move to clearing up another one of the terrible lies by the bankers for more than one hundred years when they claimed the Civil War was about the southern states resisting the end of slavery. I am sorry, but what absolute and complete bullshit. Anyone who believes that lie and anyone who continues to perpetuate that lie should be exposed as either completely stupid or a paid agent of the banks – because the evidence is overwhelming it was the North that wanted to keep slavery going and its was the southern states that were trying to implement the spirit of the Declaration of Independence by banning slavery, by giving everyone the right to vote and ending the corruption of these banks. Yes, you heard me correctly. Go and have a look at the real constitution of the Confederation of the United States of America – the founding fathers of the Confederacy ended slavery and finally aligned a constitution with the original articles of the Declaration of Independence.
Still unconvinced? OK, well you know the military sided with the Confederacy because by the code of the military it must obey the true civilian authority. Maybe that fact alone is not enough. OK, so how about we look at the proclamations of Abraham Lincoln.
You know that the only people who make proclamations are people who think they are God-Kings or Tyrants? I hope no one on this call seriously believes there is anything constitutional about proclamations, much less than being morally consistent with the Declaration of Independence. Now, if you ignore the deliberate falsity of Fort Sumter in April 1861, given the military sided with the Confederacy and the military are not going to fight amongst themselves at a fort which they already controlled unless someone is completely infected with the banker mind virus of suspending all reason, logic and common sense, then lets look at the deliberate actions of Abraham Lincoln declaring himself a God-King and Tyrant in starting the War and mass murder of hundreds of thousands of American Patriots and Heroes.
Take the first proclamation ever issued in April 15, 1861, even though it is listed as No 3. It is an order to create a standing Army of mercenaries to replace the military forces of the United States that had honorably sided with the true civilian authority being President Davis. Have a look then at the second proclamation in history a few days later to blockade the trade of the lawful United States of America. Do you honestly think these are the actions of a sane man, much less under the true authority of the Declaration of Independence, or a proxy of bankers who want to kill as many American patriots as possible to keep themselves in power?
So on the proclamations go, with the one on May 3 1861 creating a pirate navy, against the true navy of the United States and on the same day, suspending any pretense of Justice with the declaration of martial law in complete violation of every act of the United States and the previous constitution. Now, the Proclamation by Lincoln on August 12, 1861 is bizarre in calling for a day of humiliation and cursing of those against the legitimate forces of the United States of America and if you look at it you can see the signs of a man suffering terrible drug induced delusions of himself on a mission from god. Then on April 10th 1862, we finally see the motive of this drug addict, lying and mentally deluded president when he cursed the memory of the ten thousand patriots murdered by the Red Army of the United Company of Merchants during the War for Independence, when he proclaimed that the most sacred day of all American Patriots be replaced with a Thanksgiving Feast to celebrate God striking down and cursing the enemies of the bankers. Forget the pilgrims and all the other rubbish subsequently invented by those on the banker payrolls. Here in this proclamation we see the true measure of what was happening in this terrible Banking War to blemish the mind of all brave and honorable Americans.
Now, to expose the lie that Lincoln supported the abolition of slavery as vomited forth by that terrible piece of propaganda by Hollywood, have a look at the Proclamation by the God-King Tyrant Lincoln on May 19 1862, where he repudiates the actions of a General who sought to free slaves and then comes up with all kind of excuses to defer the abolition of slavery such as . In January 1863, and the "great emancipation proclamation" it was only for freeing slaves int he South (which were already free) NOT the North. In fact in December 1863, when Lincoln as God-King Tyrant proclaimed he would forgive the rebels, slaves were not to be forgiven. And people call this man a champion of human rights? Give me a break! See for yourself the insanity of this madman who saw himself as a God such as in 1864 and his own belief in his own worship in 1863.
By the end of the war, the Wall Street Bankers had amassed a million man mercenary and conscript army – the largest the world had ever seen and turned each of the Southern States into Military Occupied Districts, starting in 1865 with North Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, Texas, Alabama, South Carolina then Florida. As for the rest of the country, a raft of bogus treaties with fake Indian tribes were invented to ceded the rest of the lands to the regime.
Vancouver Island and the Minor Outlying Islands
I really think that the Bankers did not fully appreciate what the Confederate States had done until after the war. They were too busy running their banker war and doing what they were good at in making weapons of mass destruction, shipping drugs, mining and importing white slaves from Ireland as cannon fodder to worry about legal issues.
Nor do I think that the drug addict God-King Tyrant Abraham Lincoln give a damn about any form of law. To himself and as evidenced by his proclamations – he was God and so anything he said was law. After all, it was Abraham that coined the rally cry of all mentally insane tyrants and ignorant lawyers “Might is Right”.
In a sense, it is no different to the dangerously incompetent and corrupt leaders of the Congress and Senate today, who continue to back commercial ventures such as the continued theft of land and murder of Palestinians with impunity, or the unilateral embargo against Iran even though there is no logical or sane reason.
Yet the evidence is overwhelming that from 1860, the Inner and Middle Temple in London was fully conscious of the massive blunder of the bankers in how they had prosecuted their war. Your see, as we have already discussed, the Dutch families and their banks relied upon Great Britain and the United Kingdom to maintain the legitimacy of all their contracts, agreements, loans and securities. So you could imagine the complete horror of Wall Street when the message was finally given from London that there was no way on earth Westminster was going to permit the bankers from claiming to be The United States of America in private and that unless they played ball. Either they re-established legitimacy in accepting their condition as being a dominion of the Crown and Great Britain or risk losing everything.
The Dutch Banking families blinked and so a deal was struck that the regime would be recognized as militarily occupying a District of British Columbia and the United States of America in custody, to be held in trust in Delaware or literally “the state of the war” along with any other countries, nations, or territories picked up on behalf of the Crown and the Bank of England. In exchange, all treaties and statutes would remain. Thus the Minor Outlying Islands would be born if the last obstacle could be overcome – the mentally insane and drug riddled God-King Tyrant who had no intention of following through with such a plan.
The Inner and Middle Temple Legal minds had already anticipated these moves and defined the boundaries of British Columbia in 1863 (26&27Vict.c.83). Once the God-King was dead by 1865, they proceeded with the union of Vancouver Island and British Columbia in 1866 (29&30Vict.c.67). It just so happens that the act infers to British Columbia the same previous number of members as Lower Canada was recognized and then rising to twenty three – the precise number of states and territories of the Union, excluding those states converted into military prisons. The twenty three members of British Columbia through the District of Columbia being California, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin; and the border states of Delaware and Maryland and finally the District of Columbia itself.
Now, I know that people will read this and listen and say – this all sounds bizarre and far fetched and you know – in many respects you are correct. For example, why would the Dutch Bankers of Wall Street fall for such a convoluted plan, much less the military reconstituted under a military code continue to accept orders from people who have never been a true civilian rule – the answer is in many respects, they didn’t fully understand the mechanics of law and in essence believed the bluff of London. If you are still unconvinced, then just remind yourself of all the elements that have happened since and still continue to happen today. And go and have a look at the act forming the Dominion of Canada in 1867 (30&31Vict.c.3) as you will see one of the most bizarre and oblique occult references to Canada and America in all my reading of tens of thousands of Statutes. No it is not a typographical error, just as the quotes around the word “Columbia” is no printing error in the 1870 act recognizing the government of British “Columbia” (33&34Vict.c.66) just ahead of the act by Congress creating the Government of the District of Columbia to mirror the original Constitution of the United States (1871_ch62).
Now you know what the United States of America and Minor Outlying Islands means – the public and the private, the imprisoned and the mercenary occupiers. Now you know how the fabric of society of America was corrupted and why the events unfolded over the next one hundred years. Next week, we will finish off by addressing the events of the twentieth century and how this perpetual war machine was then turned toward the ultimate prize – complete world domination by the bankers and how they did it.
So until next week, to all of you who continue to help and support and donate to allow Ucadia to continue, thank you and till next week, please be safe and well. Thank you and good night. Cheers Frank
Published: [ Wed 9th Jul, 2014 ]_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (67 min 22 Mb)
Hello, this is Frank O’Collins for Tuesday 9th July 2014 and thank you for taking the time to read and listen to the Ucadia blog for this week in which we will begin the first of a three part series on the true history of the law and controls behind the scenes in the formation of the United States of America. This first part today is entitled “True History of America Part 1 (1666-1840): The Pirate Curse against the Patriots”.
Before we start, I want to cover a few points first about people who come to read and listen to this blog and audio as well as those who have had a profound impact on its research and creation.
The first point I want to cover is about any possible immediate negative feeling, or concern, or cynicism some might feel, purely on the description of the topic of this blog and the very fact that we will be speaking about the history of the United States of America. Few people or places or empires have felt as strongly about their history as those born upon the soil of the United States of America. Few people have been as brave and as steadfast in their willingness to defend what they perceive is their rights and the rights of all free people of the world. So for this reason alone, I fully understand and say to you truly that you have nothing to fear from this blog or audio.
From the perspective of most of the people on planet Earth today, the United States was founded on the highest and most profound set of principles and ideals as enshrined in the Declaration of Independence; and sealed then in the blood of patriotic men, none of whom were professional soldiers who were then willing to die in the face of overwhelming forces during the War for Independence, than live one more day under the boot of tyranny. It is no wonder that the memory of such heroes should rightly be considered sacred and inviolable and not subject to debate or revision. It is also no wonder that so many people who claim to be aware and honorable have joined such movements as the Tea Party against what they perceive as the destruction of such rights.
To all of you then I say with absolute integrity that tonight and over the following two audios and blogs, far from desecrating the memory of these founding heroes and patriots of the United States, I will endeavor to honor and restore their memory by challenging the propaganda and lies of over a hundred years that hid and desecrated the very sacrifice of these more than ten thousand men in New York at the hands of the Red Army of the United Company of Merchants. Far from dishonoring such history, I am speaking tonight to try to restore a terrible injustice which continues to be perpetuated by every single American who chooses and wishes to remain ignorant to the truth. Anyone who has sat down to devour turkey in November who has never once said a prayer on the most holy and sacred day in the history of the United States has perpetuated a great injury and stain against the true history of the United States in forgetting the memory of Martyrs Day and the wholesale slaughter of more than ten thousand patriots over a weekend, rather than months or years. In any event, I will have more to say on this during the course of this blog and audio.
The second point I want to cover is to all who come to this call who were not born on the soil of the United States of America but who may have their own opinion of the effect upon the world because of the United States. It is true that the United States has been tricked by the bankers to be at war with at least some part or all of the world for more than two hundred years. It is also true that the United States has caused untold damage and hardship across vast continents of Africa and South America and Asia, in perpetual service to European and Wall Street bankers in prosecuting perpetual warfare and piracy. Yet whatever you feel about this history dripping in blood and deception, the United States of America is also the birthplace of an extraordinary dream – an image of utopia - of rule of law, of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that is worthy to stand beside the great utopias of history. This is the utopia developed and promoted through the dream factory of Hollywood and the mass marketing of Wall Street and American Corporations.
Yet I want you to consider a thought and keep it in the back of your mind as we go through the details of this blog and audio tonight- is this dream any less real if the world itself is a dream? Is this ideal dream and Utopia promoted by the United States to the rest of the world for decades any less worthy just because the people in charge and bankers have used it as a façade to hide their real intentions? I put it to you: there is nothing, absolutely nothing that can justify the desecration of the American Dream- as this dream is one of the greatest hopes of humanity - for there remains nothing defective or dishonest concerning the words of the Declaration of Independence today much less over two hundred years ago. If anything, the revelation of the truth is about exposing the lie- that all of it – all the treaties, the statutes, the bonds, the trusts, the corporations, the rituals are an elaborate ruse to keep those who run America and the military of America trapped and subservient to an old and rotting world of the Roman Cult and elite families. There is no reason that the American Dream cannot be made completely real once the corruption and madness of how we got into this mess is properly revealed.
The third and final point I want to cover is a heartfelt thanks and to pray for forgiveness by the man who showed me so much of this and who inspired this journey and to assemble this three part series. He was the one who showed me the connections of the United Company of Merchants and their first flag in America; and he was the one who showed me the key Headquarters for the United Company of Merchants after the War for Independence hidden in plain sight; and he was the one who showed me the tables of Admiralty and Annuity calculations and was insistent in expressing that the world is entrapped by the curse of Admiralty; and he was the one who propelled me to search for the truth in an experience which he left me no doubt was a matter of the utmost honor and reality that all he had shown me and shared with me was true. I am only sorry that it has taken me so long to prepare this blog and audio to honor him and those with whom he created so much history. I pray he forgives me for doubting his intentions and for those with whom he founded the basis of the American dream. I only hope that what we discuss tonight and over the following series goes someway to restoring the dream and vision he and the other brave men had for the United States of America.
I am not going to mention his name for now, not because I fear reprisal. As far as my life I am an open book. Those who control the world know there is more to life and existence than the flesh and blood of our bodies. Yet the reason I will not mention the man who was chosen to speak with me and is ultimately responsible for this discussion, is that I do not want those who are suffering mental illness and the mind virus of arrogant stupidity to belittle anything that is shown tonight. Maybe, sometime in the future, I will recount the full events of this meeting, but for now let’s get started in the detail of part 1.
The Law of Nations and the Reality of the Commercial World
To begin this journey, we need to consider the reality of the politics and power of the world leading up to the War for Independence in the final quarter of the 18th Century and the aspirations of those men who had come to the new world in search of something better.
The phrase “Law of Nations” began with a work first published in 1749 by German writer Christian Wolf entitled “The Law of Nations According to the Scientific Method”. The word Nation is a direct loan word from the Latin term natio meaning “lesser tribe, or race, or breed or class of animals”. Unsurprisingly, the appearance of the word “nation” within the “enlightenment” or “illuminati” movement of the 18th Century is obscure at best and positively “Jesuitical”. Suddenly, all across Europe the word Nation was being associated with new ideas and concepts of philosophers such as Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (1646-1716), Denis Diderot (1713-1784), François-Marie Arouet known as Voltaire (1694-1778) Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), David Hume (1711-1776), Adam Smith (1723-1790) and Emerich de Vattel (1714-1767) to name a few.
What these brilliant minds started to almost unanimously proclaim is the idea that the old world and hierarchy of religion, then church, then monarch, then government, then people was outmoded and outdated and that this “new” concept of nations under Natural Law where religion was to be kept completely separate was the future. The only problem with this idea was that it did not resemble or align with the history of civilization from the beginning of time, nor the history of law nor the present world then or since. Instead, it created a kind of idealistic overlay on the raw machine and apparatus of power.
As I have discussed in these blogs and audios before – and even last week, there exists a natural hierarchy of law and of authority that begins with the recognition that: we are more than animals; and more than just conscious minds; and that we are divine immortal spirits- that can never die or be sold, or enslaved except with our consent or willful ignorance. The strongest possible law, authority and legitimacy is when a people recognize their spiritual, intellectual and physical presence and unity in some sacred covenant of formation, such as we have discussed and outlined through Pactum De Singularis Caelum and the individual will and testament model Voluntatem Et Testamentum.
Yet from the middle of the 18th Century moving forward, there was this huge momentum to embrace the concept of the secular state and the secular nation based on “natural law” that disowned such history. One of the most influential of these works to affect the thinking of countless world leaders for more than two hundred years was a work heavily adapted from the work of Christian Wolf by Swiss born Emerich de Vattel, called The Law of Nations or more formally called “Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns” first published in French in 1758. In four books, this work outlined in unprecedented detail the nature and function of a nation, its relation with other nations, the principles of war and the principles of peace. In fact the work called the “Law of Nations” was so detailed and superficially comprehensive that no one thought to question the strange density of admiralty, commercial and pirate banking principles of Westminster within its maxims. Yet today, “Law of Nations” still stands as effectively the foundation of what most people perceive to be international law.
In fact, the reality of real power and control between nations, resembled something vastly different than the fictional work of Emerich de Vattel and the Jesuits. Far from religion being on the decline in the 17th and 18th Century, organized religion and in particular the Roman Cult controlling the Vatican was on the ascendency as the power alliances across Europe strengthened not weakened – despite the contrary appearance through war. Take 1666 for example and the formation of the Grand Luciferian Alliance with London as its Capital through royal treaties between the Crown of England and various other crowns including the Crown of Sweden, the Crown of Denmark and Norway, the Crown of Portugal, the Crown of Spain, the Crown and Algiers, the Crown of Tunis, the Crown of Tripoli and the States General of the United Netherlands. This Grand Alliance of Commerce and Navigation under Admiralty, sealed by the auto de fate of burning alive of more than sixty thousand heretics through the ordering of the burning of London by King Charles II, also signals the birth of the infamous Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 and the principle of Proof of Life declaring all the poor of the world to be “dead to law” and subjects of Lucifer, personified by the Black Pope.
Far from America being isolated from such madness and delusion, such treaties as 1686 Treaty between Spain and England, set the future tone for America to become the headquarters for this Grand Luciferian Alliance known as the New World Order- exemplified by the absurd amount of Luciferian occultism blatantly built into the city of Washington over a hundred years later. By the way, have a look at the document outlining this treaty published in the 18th Century- do you see it mentioned Great Britain? Of course Great Britain was not created until 1706 or 30 years later, so the document should be treated with great care.
In the early 18th Century, the vision of America was far more basic- America was the home of the pirates and privateers. Take for example an Act by Queen Anne in 1707 (6Ann.c.37) promoting licensed piracy and supported by an act nearly thirty years later under King George II in 1740 (13Geo2.c.4). This has nothing to do with the high ideal of Rule of Law, but blatant organized crime. It is no wonder we see a whole string of Admiralty acts concerning the repatriation of prizes and bounty and goods to England from the piracy trade of those in America willing to sell their soul, such as in 1710 (9Ann. c.27), 1711 (10Ann.c.22), 1713 (12Ann.S.1c.9), 1721 (8Geo1.c.12), 1742 (15Geo2.c.31)and 1764 (5Geo3.c.11).
It is also not surprising that because the founding of America is intimately connected with the implementation of Admiralty Law upon the land, that the original county courts of America from 1756 (29Geo2.c.27) have always been under Admiralty; and that America is the only place in the world condemned and cursed by the global bankers to be their pirates and privateers forever under perpetual Admiralty by an act in 1761 (2Geo3.c.31).
For many, an even deeper curse of the United States than the history of forced and encouraged pirate activity for the Crown and Bank of England was the history of slavery and in particular the importation of millions of African people. In truth, the African slave trade into the colonies and plantations of North America did not begin until after the War for Independence in 1783 across the coffee plantations (23Geo3.c.79) and then all the colonies in 1785 (25Geo3.c.1) through the control of the United Company of Merchants. The claim that more than 250,000 slaves had been imported, much less even 20,000 slaves into the colonies prior to 1783 is a complete and terrible lie. Yes, when you read the acts of Westminster they continue to be obscure at this point, because of sensitivities by calling slaves Live Stock amongst other terms, but you heard correctly. The black slave trade did not commence until after the War for Independence.
So some of you might be scratching your heads saying – “hold on, there are all kinds of testimonies and stories about even the founding fathers owning black slaves”. Of course, this same history never mentions white slavery – or the “distempered cattle” or the “horns unwrought” from Ireland, or Scotland does it? So I will speak a little more about this apparent anomaly after we fill in the blanks on a major piece of history about the connection of the United Company of Merchants and their control in the United States of America.
The United Company of Merchants and the United States
It seems incredible that the involvement of the largest and most powerful multi-national corporation of the world in the 18th Century and its involvement in America and throughout the War for Independence could be so whitewashed from the history books of every single American and student of the world.
Just in case anyone reading or listening has an instant doubt about the complete involvement of the United Company of Merchants in the history of America and the United States, let’s talk about tea for a moment – you know the famous stories about the unjust tea trade and tea duties? Well guess what, it was the United Company of Merchants who were behind the control of the tea trade amongst other things such as the acts of parliament of 1771 (11Geo3.c.7) and 1773 (13Geo3.c.44) and (13Geo3.c.67).
In fact, the United Company of Merchants was the major trading power importing and exporting goods from the American colonies and enjoyed an unprecedented position of having to pay no duties such as in 1768 (8Geo3.c.27) and 1772 (12Geo3.c.32) and 1773 (13Geo3.c.2). So you could imagine how incensed and furious those early settlers and business people in the American colonies were facing such an unjust and one sided game where the largest multi-national corporation of the day is paying virtually no tax, while the individual farmer or trader or merchant was forced to pay huge duties to get their goods shipped or imported.
So who was the United Company of Merchants and what other evidence as to its involvement in the history of America is there?
In 1707, Queen Anne issued an act (6Ann.c.17) that the Funds of the Governor and Company of Merchants of London trading into the East Indies, commonly known as the “East India Company” and the “English Company Trading to the East Indies” be united temporarily as the United East India Company and then once debts discharged and redeemed, that a new company be formed called the United Company of Merchants of England Trading to the East Indies. Yet in 1711 (10Ann.c.28), the time to conclude and redeem the temporary fund called the United East India Company, or East India Company was left open. So despite all the writings to the contrary, if you look at the acts carefully, you will see that from 1707 onward there remained essentially still two “East India” companies.
Now one of the growing points of influence of the East India Companies was the rise of annuities or slave bonds, as was also primarily marketed through the South Seas Company, which ultimately became the primary vehicle of the Bank of England for promoting annuities as effectively slave bonds of all races of people unfortunate enough to encounter the British. We see the business connections in 1720 (7Geo1.S1.c.5) and (7Geo1.S1.c.27) and again in 1750 (22Geo2.c.22).
The two East India Companies operated on a large scale business model – they would enslave the local population, using milita employed under the authority and protection of Great Britain to keep the populations fearful and compliant, then would use the cheap labor to manufacture goods to ship back to European markets, while also controlling the import of goods.
So long as there was no general uprising, the business model worked reasonably well for them – except in its Asian markets, most notably China and India, the cost of organized terror was becoming prohibitively expensive and the company as large as it was, was at risk of collapsing in an even greater economic calamity than the South Seas Company. The risk to the control of the elite of England was clear – if the East India company collapsed, then their control as the chief slave masters and criminals of the world would be over. The solution was to look toward the plantation colonies of America.
For the standard business model of the United Company of Merchants, the vast expanses of land of North America was a huge opportunity. However, the biggest problem was the non-availability of a sufficient class of people to blatantly enslave. By 1749, it is conservatively estimated that the population across all the colonies of North America was less than 800,000. To be viable, the United Company of Merchants would have to important potentially hundreds of thousands of white slaves from Ireland and Scotland and black slaves from Africa. In any event, the United Company of Merchants was granted a two year lease in 1767 (7Geo3.c.57) for the control of the North American plantations.
The United Company of Merchants soon found that even amongst the existing plantations of Georgia, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and Rhode Island of white indentured servants and convicts mainly from Ireland and Scotland, there was resistance to the massive plans for large scale industrial slavery. To make matters worse, the free colonists of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire and New York were vehemently opposed to the moral principle of slavery. In two years, the company had failed to improve its financial position, while still having to pay £400,000 each year to the Exchequer for the lease. By 1768, the Company cried for help and a new lease over the plantations was granted for only five years (8Geo3.c.24), with the plan to conduct a limited and violently brutal war to eliminate opposition amongst the colonists. In other words, the deadline for the United Company of Merchants to deliberately start a war in order to try and kill all the patriots was by the year 1773.
Now, if you think this sounds unbelievable, just have a read of the prima facie evidence I am providing in the links. Go ahead, see for yourself. In any event, it turned out that the populations of the British Colonies in America were not that easy to stir into rebellion.
First the British tried their old “divide and conquer” method by pitting New York against Pennsylvania, Massachusetts Bay and the rest of the colonies, by permitting New York to print its own money in 1769 (9Geo3.c.35). Yet instead of causing division, the colonialists adapted and began accepting currency of New York as money across the colonies. When the United Company began raising prices of imported goods in its monopoly of trade granted by the crown in 1771 (11Geo3.c.7) and in 1772 (12Geo3.c.32), the colonialists looked to return to their knowledge of piracy and privateering in smuggling goods in and out of the colonies. Even when the crown granted the United Company of Merchants the power to use its own magistrates in 1772 (12Geo3.c.60) to pervert justice and unfairly imprison and murder patriots, there was no rebellion.
1773 was now upon the United Company of Merchants and there was still no rebellion. So the British aristocracy and the United Company of Merchants could no longer be subtle. They effectively declared open economic war against the colonies to starve the people into rebellion, beginning with the embargo of basic food stuffs into the colonies (13Geo3.c.3) and then completely outlawing any local money bills within the colonies, destroying the currency of New York (13Geo3.c.57). Finally, the United Company of Merchants had rebellion in Massachusetts Bay by 1774 and used this argument to remain in control, despite the expiry under the so called laws of Westminster of their lease. So in 1774, (14Geo3.c.19) Massachusetts Bay was made an example and the population threatened by complete starvation. Riots ensued and the United Company of Merchants was then empowered to use its resources to kill any patriots or those who resisted in the Massachusetts Bay colonies (14Geo3.c.39) and (14Geo3.c.45). It also gave the company the excuse to start building up its Red Army and Blue Army as a completely banker controlled war, with the Blue Army eventually to become known as the Continental Army. The Company then appointed one of its most devious, sociopathic and dishonest mercenary leaders to be the leader of the Blue Army.
Once open warfare was successfully ignited by 1775 (15Geo3.c.15), complete trade embargo was implemented from 1775 (15Geo3.c.10) and (15Geo3.c.18) and continued in 1776 (16Geo3.c.5).
Yet, this is where the prima facie evidence becomes overwhelming. Because, guess what? While the War for Independence was continuing, the United Company of Merchants was granted through, Westminster from being exempt from the blockade as evidenced by the act in 1776 (16Geo3.c.37) and 1778 (18Geo3.c.55) and 1779 (19Geo3.c.22) and 1780 (20Geo3.c.10) and (20Geo3.c.19) and 1781 (21Geo3.c.29). In fact trade expanded by the United Company of Merchants during the War for Independence and by 1781 (21Geo3.c.65), they were granted a new 20 year lease not only for plantations but territories under dispute – with the lease ending around 1812 and the power to appoint a Governor General for Fort William in Bengal and Fort William at New York on Manhattan Island. The first Governor General being a position granted as reward to the hired mercenary leader of the Blue Army (Continental Army) of the United Company of Merchants who successful tricked over 10,000 patriots into an ambush and their slaughter by the Red Army of the United Company of Merchants. A supremely wicked and disgusting soul who then had his ultimate act of military treachery and cowardice immortalized in a canvas of him at the head of a single boat looking like some crazed figure of the story Moby Dick.
Yet the deep connection between America and the United Company of Merchants is but an element of the picture and we need to move on to establishing the final key timeline of events for this blog and audio of what actually is meant by America and the United States of America in Westminster Statute as well as the creation of the dominions of Upper Canada and Lower Canada at the same time by the elite bankers and pirates of London.
What does the word America mean under international law?
As we discussed some weeks ago, the laws of Westminster are not only a fraud, but a fraud littered with deliberately occult, convoluted and hysterically obtuse concepts. When you actually read their claimed laws you see that there is nothing lawful about them whatsoever. Not one of them, not one matches the Golden Rule of Law, or Justice or Fairness. All of it is designed to keep people permanently distracted, divided and tricked, as they did to those brave patriots more than two hundred years ago.
Yet, given this blog and audio is about evidence of what these bankers and elite families did, we need to investigate once more some of these horribly tricky Statutes. I will start with a Statute under George 1st in 1719 (6Geo1.c.5) on declaring the Kingdom of Ireland a dependency and thereafter any mention of Ireland becomes interchangeable with the concept of a kingdom, or nation, or people who have had their own sovereignty stolen by Great Britain.
So this is the beginning of the multiple functions of italics, with Italics meaning a title, or name of a ship, or technical term being defined, or foreign word such as Latin. Proper case then in Westminster statutes for a time meant a proper noun such as a corporation and lower case meant a common noun as well as an estate or trust of the same name. So keep this in mind as we go through this final section of this blog.
We see an obscure act in 1710 (9Ann.c.17) that actually defines what is meant in Westminster Statute by the word America when defining colonies, provinces, countries and plantations being the whole of North America not just the east coast of America. The act makes clear that there is no distinction between colonies, provinces, countries and plantations in North America whether they be in land now known as Canada or land now known as the United States of America. All of them and all of it was considered the dominions of the Crown of Great Britain. We see the same brutal and emphatic claims under an act in 1766 (6Geo3.c.12) where it is made clear to the colonies that despite their own assemblies and early adoption of principles of freedom and democracy, they remained dependencies and under the foot of Great Britain and its vultures such as the Bank of England and the United Company of Merchants.
That is why the military-banking model of control from Great Britain in the 18th Century installed military officials called Governors in colonies and larger plantations, to enforce martial law from time to time and to stamp out any signs of people waking up, or starting to rebel against the utter insanity and tyranny of bankers. It is why today any place that has a Governor as its highest official, still holds ties and dependency back to Great Britain today – no matter what lies, or distractions are claimed.
So when the Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada were formed in 1791 (31Geo3.c.31) for North America, it meant the whole of North America and not simply some adjustment of the previous Province of Quebec. Just for the record, the word Quebec is not some native American Indian term for narrow water, but Latin Que+Bec meaning literally “The Bill”. In any event, the creation of a Legislative Council for Upper Canada with its Capital of Newfoundland saw the uniting of Newfoundland, St John’s Island (Prince Edwards Island), Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, St Peter’s Island (Saint Pierre and Miquelon), Rupert's Land and North West Territories. The first act of the Legislative Council of Upper Canada according to its own Statutes was to pass and ratify the act of Westminster that defined it, thus legitimizing Upper Canada.
The Capital of Lower Canada by the 1791 act was to be Quebec and the fourteen other colonies, provinces, countries and plantations of the crown of England in North America including Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, Connecticut, Massachusetts Bay, Maryland, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Virginia, New York, North Carolina, and Rhode Island and Providence Plantations and Vermont which was formed in 1791. However, according to the 1795 print of the original statutes of Lower Canada, the act of its formation was never ratified by this body and so the government of Lower Canada was loosely observed until finally abolished under the Act of Union of 1840 (2&3Vict.c.35).
Now, I know that many people who come to this blog by this stage are going to find their heads spinning and asking the question – hold on a second, there were treaties signed with the King of England such as 1783 recognizing the United States as well as an act of Parliament that explicitly recognizes the United States of America, so that is all this about Upper and Lower Canada then.
If this is what you were thinking, then you are correct. There is a treaty signed in 1783 in the hope of forming a Union – which struggled to be realized until 1789 because the colonists were not prepared to see such a Constitution put in place that kept them under the thumb of Great Britain and the United Company of Merchants. So lets have a look at the statute of Westminster that ratified the treaty in 1796 (36Geo3.c.97). What do you see? Now remember that the way words are presented in official government printing of acts of parliament is no accident. If a word is in lower case it is supposed to be in lower case. Similarly, if it is in italics, then that is the way it is supposed to be listed.
So what we see in the official act of 1796, as opposed to any deliberately corrupted reprints of the treaty is that the act recognizes a trust and an estate called the united states of the British Colonies of America, but nowhere does the act recognize a sovereign country, or nation called the United States of America in this treaty. Instead, it is saying effectively “go right ahead” and function as the trust and estate called the united states but we still own you.
So here is yet another question with these tricky and deceptive bankers and merchants that seek to continue to divide and conquer the world, as there are plenty of acts of Westminster of the same period that does list the United States of America in proper case- so what is this body?
Well, in 1783 in the same year that the Treaty of Paris was signed, there were two acts passed by Westminster (23Geo3.c.26) and (23Geo3.c.39) that did have the United States in capitals and America in italics to indicate it still considered America as its dominions. So what was this United States in capitals? It was the corporation known as the United States established by the United Company of Merchants with its 20 year lease until 1812 remember?
So was there any legitimate sovereign positions recognized for the United States by Westminster? Actually, yes – but only one. It was the creation a new position within Admiralty and the Navy called the Treasurer of the Navy in 1785 (25Geo3.c.31) based originally out of Annapolis and then forced to move offshore after the Civil War to the Philippines, then Cuba and finally to Puerto Rico. From this act which grants the position full military, admiralty, financial power from the crown and the Bank of England, it is unquestionably the most powerful position of the United States and the only banking position that can command its own forces acting as mercenaries to go out and act as pirates and privateers. You know the position as the United States Treasury.
Now you know
If your head is spinning about now, don’t worry – you are not the first. Now you know how and why countless generations of military generals and leaders born on the soil of the United States of America were tricked, threatened and trapped into serving the interests of a few global bankers and ruling elite to continue perpetual warfare and service. Hopefully, such blind obedience is coming to an end.
Now you know and enough is enough. Next week, we will discuss the evolution from the 1840s through the Civil War up until just before the changes before World War II on the never ending cycle of banker funded and driven wars this machine was intended to serve.
To all of you who continue to support and help Ucadia- thank and until next week, please be safe and well.
Thank you and goodnight.
Published: [ Mon 30th Jun, 2014 ]_________________________________________________________________
Please download MP3 Audio Broadcast of this Blog > here (34 min 12 Mb)
Hello, this is Frank O’Collins for Tuesday 1st July 2014 and thank you for taking the time to read and listen to the Ucadia blog for this week entitled “The True Rule of Law defined: Any law that is against such truth, cannot be law”.
To begin, I do not intend this to be a long blog or audio. Instead, I wish for the words expressed tonight to be as clear as possible and to speak for themselves. Sometimes when you speak too long, or try to give too much information, it can make it harder for some folks to concentrate and absorb the key information.
Instead, I will share with you in just one hundred and thirty three verses, the key standards and measure by which you, or anyone with whom you share this audio may know the True Rule of Law and why any law that is against any of these one hundred and thirty three verses cannot be law.
The reason I am able to be so confident that the one hundred and thirty three verses I am about to share with you is the most concise, the most accurate and the only true Rule of Law is because these principles have existed in all higher civilizations since the time of the Sumerians, the Egyptians, the Hittites and Canaanites, the Assyrians and Babylonians, the Greeks and the Romans; as well as from the time of Emperors Hadrian, Antonius Pius, Marcus Aurelius and then later under Constantine and even up to the time of the Carolingians and Charlemagne in the 9th Century. In fact, the only times the true Rule of Law has been hidden, or defiled is the past few hundred years when greedy and mentally insane pirates and bankers have sought to take control of the world. About the same time we see the creation of fake religious texts, fake law and fake history all to control the world as slaves.
As for the reason I am doing this audio on the True Rule of Law it remains clear that many continue to be distracted and hurt by others who confuse, beguile, trick and entrap with all kinds of information and rituals claimed to be remedy in law, when none of it, absolutely none of it has anything to do with law, but stealing from people.
Another key reason is the fact that I have spent considerable time proving to you in the past few months of Ucadia Blogs that there is absolutely nothing lawful about common law or any form of law coming out of London or Washington or Rome for that matter. But without you or those with whom you choose to share this blog having a measuring stick – how can you discern what is true versus what is more disinformation?
Going to court is not easy. Being arrested is not fun. Having heavily armed para military breaking your door down and terrifying your children or your family is a trauma that few people ever truly overcome. So I don’t blame anyone who has read parts of Ucadia, or listened to some of these audios yet still does not get it. The legal system is extraordinarily complex and intimidating. I have spent nearly twenty years and read every statute since the time of Henry III of England to the 20th Century and I can tell you it is mind boggingly complex. So how could I or anyone really get angry at anyone who still is struggling to find their way and overcome the threat of losing their home, or custody of their children, or surviving in a sea of debt, or any other number of challenges?
It doesn't matter if I have explained the Rule of Law a thousand times like I did in a blog the same time last year – if it is not getting through then, there is no excuse not to keep trying to make it clear. So to all of you who have come to Ucadia and felt lost through the information, I apologize without reservation and hope that this audio and blog goes some way to make reparations for any confusion you may have felt.
Another apology I need to give is to all of you who are expecting me to start the 3 part series on the history of the law in America this week. Please be patient and let me address first the issue of what is the law, before we continue unmasking the fact that we have been living under the boot of a system without an inch of legitimacy or law for far too long.
So what is the true Rule of Law
So what is the true Rule of Law? Well, the Bible has but one, only one verse that summarizes the Golden Rule as found in all other higher civilizations under Matthew 7:12 saying “Therefore all things whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you even so to them: for this is the Law of the prophets”. In other words, the Rule of Law is “All law is equal that no one is above it”.
This is the same rule we find in the Ancient Egyptian text Tales of the Eloquent Servant from 1800 BCE: "Do for one who may do for you, that you may cause him thus to do."
And the same rule again from the 6th Century BCE through Confucius Analects 15:23: "Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you".
From the Brahman Mahabharata, 5:1517 we have: "This is the sum of Dharma [duty]: Do naught unto others which would cause you pain if done to you".
In fact, there is no rational or reasonable or sane priest or judge or president or prime minister that would dare deny the existence of the Golden Rule of Law. Instead, they hope you would not speak about it or write about it.
Why? Because these people are the custodians of a system now totally operating on procedure with not an ounce of competence as to the origin of true law or the meaning of the law. In fact, there are numerous papers and books written over the past eighty years by so called legal experts who proclaim the law is whatever is necessary for the continuance of order – in other words, the “law is whatever I say it is”. What complete rubbish! What utter facile stupidity! As was proven last week, modern international law and commercial law is at its heart Admiralty law and the fact that these judges and legal experts have probably never read one single statute on Admiralty Law, yet continue to promote “legal realism” just goes to show how insane the system has become.
So when you are able to prove and see that in centuries and thousands of years past, everyone, absolutely everyone could learn what the true Rule of Law is and could even memorize it, you see why the existing system is absolutely desperate to keep you distracted, off balance and under stress.
So what is the best summary of the Rule of Law? Well, I am going to quote 133 verses from a most sacred and profound text called Lebor Clann Glas in the Age of the Nazarenes. If you have not read it, then I strongly suggest you do. In any event, in just one hundred and thirty three verses, this Chapter summarizes the whole structure of true law.
This is what you need to know before you send any document to any court, or before you seek to represent yourself, or before you listen to any remedy guru or follow any suggestion from your friends, or decide on any course of action in the existing system. This is the measure, the standard by which you will be able to see whether something is true or false, something is wisdom or disinfo. So lets start:
12 There is, there was, there has only ever been One Law.
13 All law is equal that no one is above it,
14 All law is measured that all may learn and know it,
15 All law is standard that it may always be applied the same.
16 A law is a rule that prohibits or permits certain acts.
17 A rule is a norm, bar, maxim, measure or standard.
18 A rule may be derived by instruction, discovery, custom or consent.
19 The highest law is Divine being a rule given by divine instruction,
20 As nothing may contradict such a rule.
21 The second highest law be the reason of Mind,
22 Being an edict given by a great council of wise elders or jurists,
23 As nothing absurd and without good reason may be considered law.
24 The third highest law be the law of the people,
25 As the consent and will of the people is the source of true authority.
26 The weakest rule is that of a tyrant,
27 As any rule without authority or right of heaven but merely by force,
28 Cannot be sustained and the people shall eventually overcome,
29 And render such unjust rule and unjust laws as dust.
30 This be the law of all great civilizations from the beginning of time,
31 And no king or assembly or city has sustained in ignorance to such foundation.
32 These then be the foundations of Rule of Law:
33 All law be spoken as it is the spirit of the word that carries the authority.
34 Therefore all action under law be by word of mouth,
35 And writing be only for memory and trade and never be the law.
36 All are equal under the law,
37 All are accountable and answerable under the law,
38 All are without blemish until proven culpable,
39 Where there is a law there must be a cause,
40 Where there is a law there must be a penalty,
41 Where there is a law there must be a remedy.
42 An action in law cannot proceed without first a cause.
43 An action is not granted to one who is not injured.
44 The action of a valid law can do no harm (injury).
45 An action decided in law must reflect cause of such action.
46 No injury to the law means no valid cause for action by law.
47 No action through law can arise from a fraud before heaven and earth.
48 No action through law can arise in bad faith or prejudice.
49 An act does not make one culpable unless there be intent to do wrong,
50 For no one may suffer punishment by valid law for mere intent.
51 No one is punished for the transgression of an ancestor or another.
52 No one can derive an advantage in law from his own wrong,
53 For what is invalid from the beginning does not become valid over time.
54 No one is accused of the same exact cause twice.
55 No man be a judge over his own matter,
56 Nor a man possess the authority of heaven to be both judge and executioner.
57 No penalty may exist without a valid law.
58 The immediate cause and not the remote cause be the subject of law.
59 These be the foundations of Rule of Law.
60 As to justice it be the maxim that Justice never contradicts the rule of law,
61 For Justice be the lawful right of use of all that has been defined by law,
62 And Justice be the rights to adjudicate the law itself before heaven and earth,
63 And Justice be a judge under sacred oath and trust granted such rights,
64 As a right being a power or authority or privilege or benefit recognized by law.
65 Divine Law is the law that defines the Divine and all creation,
66 And demonstrates the spirit and mind and instruction of the Divine,
67 And the operation of the will of the Divine Creator through existence.
68 Therefore all valid rights and Justice is derived from Divine Law.
69 Natural Law is the law that defines the operation of the will of the Divine,
70 Through the existence of form and sky and earth and physical rules.
71 Thus Natural Law governs the operation of what we can see and name.
72 The laws of People are those rules enacted by men having proper authority,
73 For the good governance of a society under the Rule of Law.
74 The laws of People are always inherited from Natural Law.
75 A law of People cannot abrogate or usurp a Natural Law,
76 Nor is it possible for a Natural Law to usurp Divine Law.
77 These then be the foundations of Justice:
78 All possess the Right to be heard even if such speech be controversial,
79 All possess the Right of free will to choose our actions and destiny,
80 All possess the Right of reason that distinguishes them from lesser animals,
81 All possess the Right to informed consent or withdraw consent,
82 All possess the Right over their body that none may claim our flesh,
83 All possess the Right of our divine self that none may claim our soul.
84 Thus no man can make a blood oath on their flesh or vow on their soul,
85 Nor may any man claim servitude or obligation under such an abomination,
86 For such Rights are granted solely by heaven to all people,
87 And no man or body of jurists have the authority to usurp heaven or the gods.
88 Verily all true authority and power to rule is inherited from heaven,
89 And to only those men in good faith and good character and good conscience,
90 Who then make a sacred oath in trust and form an office,
91 Into which such Divine Rights are conveyed for only so long,
92 As they honor their oath and obligations to serve the people.
93 For whenever a man who makes an oath to form a sacred trust of office,
94 Then breaks such an oath through prejudice or unclean hands or bad faith,
95 Then all such authority and power ceases from them,
96 As the cord between heaven and earth is severed and the trust dissolved.
97 Verily no man may serve the people unless under sacred oath,
98 Nor may any man serve heaven unless under solemn vow.
99 Therefore guard your behavior and actions of office,
100 That though the heavens appear to fall, let justice always be done.
101 These be the foundations of Justice.
102 As to the administration of Justice these be the foundations of Due Process:
103 No valid action in law proceeds without first a valid cause,
104 And no valid cause exists until such claim is first tested.
105 Thus the birth of all action in law must begin with the claim.
106 If a claim be not proven as a valid cause then the accused has nothing to answer.
107 Yet if the claim be proved to have merit as a cause,
108 Then all valid causes in law must be resolved.
109 Thus, he who first brings the claim must first prove its merit,
110 As the burden of the proof lies upon him who accuses not he who denies.
111 A heavy obligation then on one who first brings the controversy.
112 For one who brings false accusation is the gravest of transgressors,
113 That it injures not one law, but all heaven and all law.
114 Thus a valid claim in part is one in which an accuser makes a complaint,
115 Bringing two witnesses as proof and petitions a forum of law for remedy.
116 If merit of a cause be proved, the one accused must appear to answer.
117 The one accused and any witnesses appear by summons.
118 When anyone be summonsed, he must immediately appear without hesitation.
119 If a man summonsed does not appear or refuses to appear to answer,
120 Then let him be seized by force to come and attend.
121 When anyone who has been summonsed seeks to evade, or attempts to flee,
122 Let the one who summons lay hands on them to prevent their escape.
123 One who flees fair judgment confesses his culpability.
124 The accused cannot be judged until after the accusations be spoken,
125 And then after the accused exercise or decline their three rights to defense,
126 The first being Prolocution and the right to speak as a matter of law,
127 And why the complaint and investigation should not continue,
128 The second being Collocution as to why the complaint and accusation is false,
129 And upon such proof why the burden should now be placed on the accuser,
130 And the third being Adlocution being a final speech in defense,
131 Against a complaint or accusation having been heard.
132 If illness or old age hinder the appearance of the one summonsed,
133 Let the one who made the summons provide a basic means of transport.
134 When men wish to settle their dispute among themselves,
135 Then they shall have the right to make peace.
136 If a dispute cannot be settled before seeking a judge,
137 Then both the accused and the accuser must be granted equal hearing.
138 An accused cannot be found culpable unless three pieces of evidence may be attributed.
139 Judges are bound to explain the reason of their judgment.
140 The setting of the sun shall be the extreme limit of time within,
141 Which a judge must render his decision.
142 These be the foundations of Due Process.
143 These be the foundations of Rule of Law and Justice.
144 Any law that is against such truth, cannot be law.
And just to quote six more versus from another chapter of Age of the Nazarenes in Lebor Clann Glas:
139 Verily the Divine Creator is love and heaven is love,
140 And the truth of all existence is the awareness of the love of life.
141 Be gentle then to one another and do not bear false witness,
142 For you are the rock upon which the kingdom of heaven on earth is built.
143 Therefore, whatever you seek men to do to you, do also to them,
144 For this is the Rule of Law and the Law of the Prophets.
The Rule of Law is that simple
So there you have it. In just 133 verses, the complete summary of Law, of Justice and Due Process. It is that simple and until you know this, until you see the wisdom of this – until this is the measure by which you measure all claims, all promises, all alleged remedies you will be at risk of trickery, lies, scam artists and government agents.
So when a politician gets up and says this or that is the rule of law, now you have the measure to know if they are speaking the truth or lying. And when a priest or rabbi or imam or any other religious person gets up and starts proclaiming the law, now you know the measure of whether they are speaking the truth or are false messengers.
You do not need to fear the law or be intimidated by the law. You have just heard what the law is – not what the law is not. The law is not common law. The law is not admiralty law. The law is not secret rituals, secret documents, secret ways of getting out of trouble. The law is the Golden Rule and all the maxims that follow it.
Now you know. Now there is no excuse. Either you re-listen and re-read this blog until you get it, or you do not. So if you ignore this knowledge you and you alone are responsible for what happens.
Good luck then in your reading and to all of you who continue to support Ucadia and the work I keep trying to do each day, thank you!